From semantics to feelings: how do individuals with schizophrenia rate the emotional valence of words?

Schizophrenia is characterized by both emotional and language abnormalities. However, in spite of reports of preserved evaluation
of valence of affective stimuli, such as pictures, it is less clear how individuals with schizophrenia assess verbal material
with emotional valence, for example, the overall unpleasantness/displeasure relative to pleasantness/attraction of a word. This
study aimed to investigate how schizophrenic individuals rate the emotional valence of adjectives, when compared with a
group of healthy controls. One hundred and eighty-four adjectives differing in valence were presented. These adjectives were
previously categorized as “neutral,” “positive” (pleasant), or “negative” (unpleasant) by five judges not participating in the current
experiment. Adjectives from the three categories were matched on word length, frequency, and familiarity. Sixteen individuals
with schizophrenia diagnosis and seventeen healthy controls were asked to rate the valence of each word, by using a computerized
version of the Self-Assessment Manikin (Bradley and Lang, 1994). Results demonstrated similar ratings of emotional valence of
words, suggesting a similar representation of affective knowledge in schizophrenia, at least in terms of the valence dimension.
This work was supported by a postdoctoral Grant (SFRH/
BPD/68967/2010) and by the PTDC/PSI-PCL/116626/2010
Grant from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia-FCT
(Portugal) both awarded to A. P. Pinheiro., and by the National
Institute of Mental Health-NIMH (RO1 MH 040799
grant awarded to R. W. McCarley.; RO3 MH 078036 grant
awarded to M. Niznikiewicz).